From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Sep 17 12:18:45 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 39F1514BC6; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D90E81E022; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 15:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA17099;
	Fri, 17 Sep 1999 15:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id MAA27137;
	Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199909171918.MAA27137@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: asami@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports that don't respect ${LOCALBASE}
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:18:38 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2e/makemail 2.8u
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>By the way, the reason why I've only tried changing LOCALBASE and not
>X11BASE is because the XFree86 tarball (built manually beforehand, and
>honestly it's a large pain to do that) already includes "/usr/X11R6"
>in there.

And any USE_IMAKE ports are going to configure themselves to install
in the same place as X installed, no matter what X11BASE/PREFIX is
set to.

  Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message