From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 7 1:26:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5631637BAE2; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 01:26:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12SGFf-000Ne0-00; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 11:26:03 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Warner Losh Cc: Kris Kennaway , bloom@acm.org, John Baldwin , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh strangeness in -current... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2000 13:32:00 MST." <200003062032.NAA61484@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 11:26:03 +0200 Message-ID: <90891.952421163@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 13:32:00 MST, Warner Losh wrote: > : This sounds bad. Are you referring to the -o syntax differences, or > : actual incompatabilities? > > I'm talking about the -o syntax difference specifically. How does the > following sound? What about the off-by-one hostkey length problem? Is it supposed to be possible to drop a "1024-bit" host key from the old ssh1 port into /etc/ssh ? We don't seem to be having much luck with that over here. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message