From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 20:01:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14947BA9; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@felyko.com) Received: from felyko.com (felyko.com [174.136.100.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE5C271; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:c2:bd70:2451:66e7:97d] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4d00:c2:bd70:2451:66e7:97d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by felyko.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E28D3981E; Tue, 28 May 2013 13:01:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=felyko.com; s=mail; t=1369771261; bh=ODUF8au/zAisiwpokd1l5aCGhbVXsQeF6fsrr/orwH4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=cPyk7WViibOR3Rt9x1MedF2m1u6sV0AtIeiScbZvU8QGA3ZBx3UeWTJclcgX26G4H 8wAokYH8/Z1SPY2x5ULxeQQsWh6/qIXgLS8TaCano+tsGOjg50jFlVfgYQbJIrAmB9 B7BmP0xsJ27PiY/kx2bxrNLgy7eZc0rY0Cm50IyE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] gcc: support for barcelona From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <20130528195457.GA52250@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:01:00 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <51A38CBD.6000702@FreeBSD.org> <51A3B8AB.5080808@FreeBSD.org> <521EEFA1-E116-41F5-B618-238E7AA092A8@bsdimp.com> <3C29AD82-077D-4E6B-94C7-5D069A130348@FreeBSD.org> <20130528195457.GA52250@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Steve Kargl X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Pedro Giffuni X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 20:01:08 -0000 On 28 May 2013, at 12:54, Steve Kargl = wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote: >> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, = there's still many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS = support. There's 0 chance it will be gone in 10... >>=20 >> I disagree. There is a significant chance that gcc in base >> will be gone for all Tier 1 platforms in 10.0. There are >> still some reasons to want gcc installed, but there are no >> compelling reasons to want an ancient version of gcc installed >> on x86[-64] or ARM. For people who need gcc, the ports >> collection provides a selection of recent versions. >>=20 >> David >=20 > I surely hope not! Until the individuals pushing the > change to clang actually tests clang on floating point > intensive applications, it is IMHO dubious to even have > clang as the default compiler. Just the latest example: >=20 > = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/2013-May/000354.html Have you, or anyone else, filed bug reports at http://llvm.org/bugs/ ? Regards, -- Rui Paulo