From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 2 13: 3:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freebase.sitaranetworks.com (freebase.sitaranetworks.com [199.103.141.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 532D314C34 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@loverso.southborough.ma.us) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (loverso.sitaranetworks.com [199.103.141.107]) by freebase.sitaranetworks.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04527 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 16:03:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from loverso.southborough.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loverso.southborough.ma.us (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA14116 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 16:03:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199905022003.QAA14116@loverso.southborough.ma.us> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Our routed - Vern says it's old and buggy. In-reply-to: Message from Garrett Wollman <199904282103.RAA11123@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> . X-Face: "UZ!}1W2N?eJdN(`1%|/OOPqJ).Idk?UyvWw'W-%`Gto8^IkEm>.g1O$[.;~}8E=Ire0|lO .o>:NlJS1@vO9bVmswRoq3j DdX9YGSeJ5a(mfX[1u>Z63G5_^+'8LVqjqvn X-Url: http://surf.to/loverso Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 16:03:43 -0400 From: John Robert LoVerso Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garrett Wollman speaks the truth when he says: > > I can't quite figure why they stuck the word "open" in there, because it > > couldn't possibly be more open than RIP. > > Because a previous link-state (aka shortest-path-first) routing > protocol had been deployed which was not. I can't believe the amount of FUD on this issue. Read what Garrett says above because it is the reason for the "O" in OSPF. OSPF was developed by the IETF 10 years ago in response to the proprietary link-state routing protocol of a large router vender. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message