From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 17 16:25:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F5437B87B; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:25:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA16817; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:25:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200007172325.QAA16817@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: Latest RELENG_4. In-Reply-To: from Kris Kennaway at "Jul 16, 0 03:24:56 pm" To: kris@FreeBSD.ORG (Kris Kennaway) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:25:46 -0700 (MST) Cc: noor@comrax.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: > >> As I recall, noor@comrax.com wrote: >>> What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough >>> for a productional system? >> >> Please remember that "STABLE" refers to the stability of the source >> tree, not of the resulting running system. That is, you should not >> see developmental work going on in -STABLE. > > Well, I claim this to be false: the targetted stability *is* of the > resulting product. Of course, we sometimes make mistakes - but if you > have *any* stability problems you should tell us!! Note that I didn't claim the -STABLE systems weren't stable. I just said that the original questioner seemed to have misunderstood the meaning of the tag. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message