From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 7 08:22:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E4E1065677 for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: from web83809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (web83809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.85.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBEC78FC14 for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nrml@att.net) Received: (qmail 52110 invoked by uid 60001); 7 May 2009 08:22:11 -0000 Message-ID: <481652.51363.qm@web83809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xw57q2YVM1lSYX0s6zLrU3pFwKexcxtbQfTNt4z7VGONDK8Fgq1QCh_Jpa4IGJyAZH.oNeNrswv_8I9rtKjsmbi8KOPGtB3RMWtCEuNPFnwadIPSowT08JqgXEMc2Er7QkCQ5GaaAzwUSYCveZcejnMj1DWKqTUmwEJECc4VDU8tXxF877DavNBN9m8ym4sxoPjjnrTumICAZHpadApAmzOTDCBNDd85QmYjoj3EaHLF0R9hbmtPuSXdXH6rSohYAHtPuFxgDsjEf9PiQKPoK.VE873vDCYxJYWZF91VxhVEs7Zlv6oNYpPpRyJfU_nXGIP1obtUcKh4cZXQoIXsxgsPT64QGXv6OWpqjifiS8OyNA-- Received: from [69.43.143.67] by web83809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 May 2009 01:22:10 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:22:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabe To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <20090506135851.R72053@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, VANHULLEBUS Yvan , Scott Ullrich Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT traversal X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nrml@att.net List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 08:22:12 -0000 --- On Wed, 5/6/09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gabe wrote: > > Hi, > > I had been travelling yesterday, ... here is the summary > for today: > > > So how is it coming along? > > It's compiling; it's on might notebook since last > night as well. It > hasn't crashed yet. I haven't tested IPsec yet > either though;) > That'll probably happen the next days. Need to build a > custom > ipsec-tools port first. > Ahh, please do let us know how your IPSec testing comes along when you get to it. > > Is the goal to standardize this and commit it to > become a permanent > > part of freebsd? I've got a total of three > machines with this patch > > and would reeeeally like it if it were. > > Stadardize as in between everyone is not going to work. > Different > people have already adopted different APIs but trying to be > as > compatible with netbsd/linux sounds like a plan. OS X is > different, > unfortunately. > I see. > Having it in FreeBSD 8.x is definitively on the schedule. > Awesome, looking forward to that. > /bz > > -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is > not taking one. Thanks for the reply!