From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:30:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C594F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:30:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4228143D6D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0CLUDFR051625 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0CLUDIX051624; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:30:13 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200401122130.i0CLUDIX051624@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Kevin Kinsey Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C279A16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (cdm-66-76-92-18.cart.cox-internet.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948F443D45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:23:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kadmin@ezekiel.daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CLNAM3002741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:23:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kadmin@ezekiel.daleco.biz) Received: (from root@localhost) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CLNA1j002740; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:23:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kadmin) Message-Id: <200401122123.i0CLNA1j002740@ezekiel.daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:23:10 -0600 (CST) From: Kevin Kinsey To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: docs/61270: [patch] Grammatical shortcoming in FAQ, 11.2 (x.html) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kevin Kinsey List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:30:48 -0000 >Number: 61270 >Category: docs >Synopsis: [patch] Grammatical shortcoming in FAQ, 11.2 (x.html) >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 12 13:30:12 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kevin Kinsey >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE i386 >Organization: DaleCo, S.P. >Environment: System: FreeBSD ezekiel.daleco.biz 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #8: Thu Oct 30 14:39:04 CST 2003 kadmin@ezekiel.daleco.biz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: The FAQ is a fine document, no doubt about that, but section 11.2 contains the sentence "Your system is running at a raised secureleve, is not it?" which is not according to standard English usage and could be improved. I see no reason to allow a doc to be a potential "turn-off" for some future user. True, it would be their loss, but this is an easy fix, right? I'd a tad new to this, is there a CVS revision number for this document? The file in question is: /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/x.html and the same error appears in the WWW version, or at least it did yesterday. Thanks for considering this change, and keep up the good work, doc! (sorry, probably an old pun....) >How-To-Repeat: Read section 11.2 of the FreeBSD "FAQ". >Fix: I have two patches inline, below. The first might be the best, the second is more "faithful to the original". FIRST VERSION DIFF (/usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/x.html) --- x.html Wed Jun 4 21:44:25 2003 +++ x.edit.html Sat Jan 10 18:29:56 2004 @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@
-

Your system is running at a raised - securelevel, is not it? It is, indeed, impossible to +

Your system is probably running at a raised + securelevel. It is, indeed, impossible to start X at a raised securelevel. To see why, look at the SECOND VERSION DIFF (/usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/x.html) --- x.html Wed Jun 4 21:44:25 2003 +++ x.edit2.html Sat Jan 10 18:31:23 2004 @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@

Your system is running at a raised - securelevel, is not it? It is, indeed, impossible to + securelevel, is it not? It is, indeed, impossible to start X at a raised securelevel. To see why, look at the >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: