From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 5 06:28:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32FE106564A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 06:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087FF8FC0A for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 06:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA12879; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:28:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1T9966-0002Ly-5s; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:28:22 +0300 Message-ID: <5046F105.80706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:28:21 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120901 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vitaly Magerya References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> <1341935370.4493.4.camel@powernoodle> <4FFFD891.2060109@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:28:25 -0000 on 25/08/2012 13:52 Vitaly Magerya said the following: > On 08/07/2012, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I would like to propose the following change for review and testing: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff > > On 13/07/2012, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Many thanks to all who reviewed and tested! >> I've just committed this change. > > Andriy, will this change be available in 9.1? > > I'm not seeing it in 9.1-RC1, and using my previous workarounds now > that a proper solution is available is a pain. Vitaly, sorry for taking so long to reply. I've managed to "sneak" the "Cmax" commit into releng/9.1 branch, so it should appear in 9.1-RC2. Thank you for prodding me about that. -- Andriy Gapon