Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:13:51 +0200 From: CZUCZY Gergely <phoemix@harmless.hu> To: mike <mike503@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thinking of using ZFS/FBSD for a backup system Message-ID: <20080708211351.069a2bc5@mort.in.publishing.hu> In-Reply-To: <bd9320b30807080922k5c64443chacaa75fe0761d8bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <bd9320b30807072315x105cf058tf9f952f0f5bb2a6a@mail.gmail.com> <20080708100701.57031cda@twoflower.in.publishing.hu> <bd9320b30807080922k5c64443chacaa75fe0761d8bf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/d2G74obkWQeffRuh7Pgdoub Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We're still doing what we did. FBSD+ZFS _would_ have been the replacement. We're sucking with linux+dirvish. it's slow, dirvish is kinda retarded, it has many flaws, but it's stable. Well, in a way, you don't lose data like you would do with ZFS :) On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:22:20 -0700 mike <mike503@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/8/08, CZUCZY Gergely <phoemix@harmless.hu> wrote: >=20 > > Regardless of this, the system worked quite well. If ZFS were > > stable, this easily could be our backup system. ZFS is great, > > awesome, but a bit unreliable on FreeBSD, still needs some work. >=20 > I forgot to ask - what are you doing now instead of FBSD+ZFS? --=20 Sincerely, Gergely CZUCZY, Harmless Digital mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu Legacy software is software that works. --Sig_/d2G74obkWQeffRuh7Pgdoub Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFIc7xyzrC0WyuMkpsRAsv7AJ99Dumy7TyLGFhkKocy+hPC+Hp4gwCeO6OG zj9aOqbNY0GBAizR6N8aus8= =udZG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/d2G74obkWQeffRuh7Pgdoub--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080708211351.069a2bc5>