From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 04:04:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC05106566C for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1F48FC0C for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.188.162.219]) by nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080828040407.KBVD19703.nschwmtas04p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:04:07 +0000 Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([124.188.162.219]) by nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080828040402.MCAM2301.nschwotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:04:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 39085 invoked by uid 501); 28 Aug 2008 04:03:49 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:03:49 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: swell.k@gmail.com Message-ID: <20080828040349.GA38869@duncan.reilly.home> References: <20080819025019.GA27997@duncan.reilly.home> <20080818215813.H952@desktop> <20080819134005.GA85664@duncan.reilly.home> <20080820214627.C30593@desktop> <20080827233831.GA16705@duncan.reilly.home> <86hc96t3dd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86hc96t3dd.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE problem: slow single processor, realtime prio vs network stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:04:09 -0000 On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:00:46AM +0400, swell.k@gmail.com wrote: > Just curious, have you tried setting dev.pcm.%d.polling to `1'? > > from the sound(4): > Experimental polling mode support where > the driver operates by querying the > device state on each tick using a > callout(9) mechanism. Disabled by > default and currently only available > for a few device drivers. I'm using the 4front-tech oss driver, rather than the native one. I need all of the channels on my M-Audio Delta1010 sample synchronous, and the native driver seems to be limited to channel pairs... > Or turning on network driver polling(4)? Or even both? > Does it make any difference? Haven't tried it. Could do, I suppose. Will try. Cheers, Andrew