From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 16:50:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0A1C6D for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com (mail-qc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0A02E03 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 16:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so9329781qcv.38 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQV/PXYE3trdDcx48cD/2ksxmlWdHzsv+RfFjq+1Yg4=; b=vGz2MBTqS1GFUB8cwSixISd95zsiBbA2M81s/X04FWNqtdaTeUiskvnAWAAao4r5RT DMi/ZqlpKnqdZc5727Y2hvGY3EDa6o35VrAPzzk25saGImTCxdLwMuqoZ6Eth5TBqsMI 7ygGRF/XtIdNusXIb91CmuwnHo5dueGLDsXNoBRd/SS80B8ms3t01EL/l5AUDTCWO9Tm QjGbddscHcDBeoJQWfr5fgPeh3IDy8eQLc2oEEcVOz4ap8lFQ1a5S0+htmi9bzs1cOQl WysnRFGMurbAPGTweHXPocnr/GHXg1gcxmiTVdeZtQ8Rs8newbZvE4LZYfn2YYYG7LGA p+MA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.47.130 with SMTP id n2mr49700599qaf.26.1400518221609; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:50:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.191.201 with HTTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:50:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:50:21 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: YJTs9cMzs8Ry6Lx01q5NdCzfl_s Message-ID: Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current From: Adrian Chadd To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:50:23 -0000 isn't eabi on the xscale still broken? -a On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh wrote: > Greetings, > > MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platfor= ms currently. I=E2=80=99m eliminating it as a build option. It must die bec= ause it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI. > > So, to that end, I see two options: > > (1) Retire and remove oabi support. > (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb. > > The rough consensus of arm developers I=E2=80=99ve polled now, and in the= past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is workin= g for everybody. > > Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a p= roblem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi. > > Comments? > > Warner > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"