From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 15 10:03:07 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA22738 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:03:07 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA22720 ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:02:55 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA01359; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:00:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199509151700.KAA01359@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD suffer from the Intel RZ1000 IDE bug? To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 1995 10:00:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: sos@freebsd.org, jehamby@lightside.com, R.L.Hesketh@ukc.ac.uk, hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509150643.IAA29470@keltia.Freenix.FR> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 15, 95 08:43:21 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 381 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > It seems that sos@freebsd.org said: > > And I know of the problem :) > > By the way there isn't much point in using DMA on the IDE interface > > anyway, so I simply don't use it... > > Less CPU load ? Is why you buy SCSI instead of IDE. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.