From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 08:53:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F7616A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:53:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail20.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail20.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C134043D5A for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:53:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) j188rgJ8007873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:44 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1])j188rg7l059211; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:42 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost)j188rfiA059210; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:42 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:41 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: supraexpress@globaleyes.net Message-ID: <20050208085341.GB57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20050208034855.D211E43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050208034855.D211E43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:53:46 -0000 On Mon, 2005-Feb-07 21:48:48 -0600, supraexpress@globaleyes.net wrote: > FreeBSD's >'DOS-like menu' system is a travisty and IS PROBABLY THE ONE THING THAT TURNS >OFF MORE PROSPECTIVE FBSD USERS THAN ANYTHING ELSE - I know - I have heard! An X-based GUI would be worse - the installer size would grow about 50 times and the minimum RAM requirements would grow several times. Given FreeBSDs target (servers) it's important the the installer run over a serial port. >I offer the following suggestions for cogitation and realize that some >of MY choices may not be "the best", but here goes anyhow: Unfortunately, your patches to implement this got lost in transit. Could you resend them please :-) -- Peter Jeremy