From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 8 15:13:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7461065691 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 15:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57DF8FC17 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 15:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [88.130.203.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430EB8A012C for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 17:13:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A044C17.3060006@bsdforen.de> Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 17:13:27 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090408) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: obfuscated email addresses in CVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 15:13:33 -0000 It has recently come to my attention that some commiters obfuscate email addresses in the CVS logs, e.g: Submitted by: Dominic Fandrey (maintainer) Is this a policy? I prefer for my email address not to be obfuscated: Submitted by: Dominic Fandrey (maintainer) I'm convinced that SPAM bots can read these obfuscated email addresses without problems anyway. So why bother making email less simple for every one?