From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Mar 14 22:50:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.249.129.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A143B150BD for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:50:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA92786; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:49:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199903150649.WAA92786@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Gregory Sutter Cc: Andreas Klemm , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:46:17 PST." <19990314184616.G20826@orcrist.mediacity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:49:09 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Well, if you wanted this to be really public, you picked the right way > to go about it. Just wait until someone drops this onto the linux > lists. I wonder what the signal:flame ratio will be. Bets, anyone, on > time to slashdot, as well as the ratio? > Lets us hope that indeed the linux folks do get feisty so that the debate may spill out to the Press that is if Brett doesn't beat them first 8) Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message