From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 29 18:46:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063D016A485 for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 18:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D7513C48C for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 18:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D061A4D81; Tue, 29 May 2007 11:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A688512AB; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:46:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6F35CC1DD; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:46:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:46:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: eculp@encontacto.net Message-ID: <20070529184635.GA48575@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070529072916.1kern4i8n4wkwgs4@intranet.encontacto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070529072916.1kern4i8n4wkwgs4@intranet.encontacto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 18:46:38 -0000 On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:29:16AM -0500, eculp@encontacto.net wrote: > On all my machines (both current and stable) that I've initiated the > xorg mega upgrade I'm seeing: > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable > > I remember having seen this previously and googled for it and found a > ports thread from a couple of years ago that wasn't much help which > follows: > > > This is usually because you specified an illegal USE_* option in the > > make environment, but perhaps someone committed a mistake. > > Got it - because someone pointed out a bug in another thread. > > I'm tripping over ports/37596. > > > Is anyone else having this problem or can point me in the right > direction to fix it. Typically the above advice is correct, and the fix is to correct whatever is broken in your make.conf. Kris