From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 01:07:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222B916A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from einet.bg (sonata3.bginter.net [217.79.32.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E70343D2F for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:07:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tie@einet.bg) Received: from root by einet.bg with scanned-ok (Exim 4.21) id 1AiVOI-0008WK-VS for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:08:14 +0200 Received: from [217.79.34.250] (helo=filipov) by einet.bg with smtp (Exim 4.21) id 1AiUOA-0007kI-Tj; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:04:02 +0200 Message-ID: <00af01c3de62$efaf4bf0$6e00a8c0@filipov> From: "Emil Filipov" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" References: <009401c3dc3c$1fa680e0$6e00a8c0@filipov> <20040116144135.GA92854@cell.sick.ru> <00aa01c3dc4b$1275e500$6e00a8c0@filipov> <20040117184423.GA99268@cell.sick.ru> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:04:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPOE server with pppoed and mppe X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:07:56 -0000 Hi, G> How much Mbytes/sec have you got with MPPE? I get about 70-80 kbytes/s, while without encrytion the speed is 150-160 kbytes/s (and that's my hardware limit). A friend of mine tested my configuration in a LAN and got no decrease in the performance with encryption added. I am going to try to exclude the VLAN and VDSL parts (over which my connection goes) and see what happens. It seems that no one has seen this problem before, so it must be something specific for my configuration. I'll post a follow-up as soon as I discover the problem. Thanks for the cooperation though :) Regards, Emil Filipov