Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:13:03 +0100 From: "Roopinder Singh" <rs@midearth.co.uk> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of NetBSD Message-ID: <621a3d0609050213m1a48e642xe19e4f3f51c709b8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060905065542.GB13764@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20060830232723.GU10101@multics.mit.edu> <98f5a8830608301731s2b0663e3g94b0bd32f8a06a78@mail.gmail.com> <c6d37fe0608310259k12fe629eve59e59042fcfdb4c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0608311312190.8977@odem.66h.42h.de> <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com> <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org> <f34ca13c0608310843p4e28b57eoec2f60737c034ddb@mail.gmail.com> <20060831184715.B82634@hub.org> <20060905065542.GB13764@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/5/06, Andreas Klemm <andreas@freebsd.org> wrote: > The 50 distributions are only a burden if it comes to the point > what different shared library / Java / TCL / etc ... versions > are packaged with the OS. > > A friend of mine doing Java development had severe issues with > all that different Linux versions. Bit OT here: unless you're doing some JNI or SWT (using GTK) then Java by itself is pretty self contained.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?621a3d0609050213m1a48e642xe19e4f3f51c709b8>