From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 18:49:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792841065678 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213A18FC16 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2F865C248; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:49:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftvUiwY81u-Q; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:49:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2679D65C1E7; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:49:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8EInX5S086603; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:49:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:49:33 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Jose Garcia Juanino , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080914184933.GB86425@freebsd.org> References: <20080912205202.GA83925@sanabria> <20080913070920.GA1440@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <20080913084412.GA1263@sanabria> <20080913085108.GA2308@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> <20080913205515.GA6158@sanabria> <20080914090856.GA51307@freebsd.org> <20080914092519.GA3121@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080914092519.GA3121@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: sqlplus segfaults when receiving INT signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:49:26 -0000 On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 01:25:19PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 11:08:56AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:55:17PM +0200, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > > > El s?bado 13 de septiembre a las 10:51:08 CEST, Chagin Dmitry escribi?: > > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:44:13AM +0200, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your response. > > > > > > > > > > The output is: > > > > > > > > > > # uname -vp > > > > > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p4 #3: Thu Sep 4 08:54:56 CEST 2008 root@:/usr/obj/src/sys/MK2008Jun06 i386 > > > > > > > > > > [ .... ] > > > > > > > > > > > > > thnx, I believe you problem already fixed at 07.09.08, > > > > please cvsup and try yet... > > > > > > I have done that now, but sadly, there is no difference with 7.0: > > > > > > $ uname -r > > > 7.1-PRERELEASE > > > > > > $ /compat/linux/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.3/client/bin/sqlplus /nolog > > > > > > SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Sat Sep 13 20:47:47 2008 > > > > > > Copyright (c) 1982, 2006, Oracle. All Rights Reserved. > > > > > > SQL> [hit CTRL+C] > > > Segmentation fault > > > > > > Best regards > > > > please provide ktrace/linux_kdump... the "unknown futex operation" problem is fixed > > in this release so there must be something else > > 1428 sqlplus 0.874520 CALL munmap(0x28066000,0xc41d) > 1428 sqlplus 0.874543 RET munmap 0 > 1428 sqlplus 0.874553 CALL linux_set_tid_address(0x292cf708) > 1428 sqlplus 0.874563 RET linux_set_tid_address 1428/0x594 > 1428 sqlplus 0.874572 CALL linux_set_robust_list(0x292cf710,0xc) > 1428 sqlplus 0.874580 RET linux_set_robust_list -1 errno 22 (EINVAL) Invali > d argument > 1428 sqlplus 0.874596 CALL linux_sys_futex(0xffffdbc4,FUTEX_WAKE|FUTEX_PRIVA > TE_FLAG,0x1,0x292cf6c0,0x29154ff4,0xffffdbd8) > 1428 sqlplus 0.874608 RET linux_sys_futex 1 > 1428 sqlplus 0.874641 CALL linux_rt_sigaction(SIG 32,0xffffd87c,0,0x8) > 1428 sqlplus 0.874651 RET linux_rt_sigaction 0 the robust futexes are also implemented in -CURRENT but I dont feel like MFcing them.... the error is also harmless do you want me guys to MFC the robust futexes?