From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 25 09:48:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CE3CC1E5F; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [195.149.99.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "raven.bwct.de", Issuer "raven.bwct.de" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59D3922; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v0P9mNAX081920 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:48:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0P9mKsH050327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:48:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0P9mKbv007864; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:48:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v0P9mKUf007863; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:48:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:48:20 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Mark Millard , freebsd-arm , Bernd Walter , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? Message-ID: <20170125094820.GB7817@cicely7.cicely.de> Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <87BFEE93-7617-4131-832B-BE697D352E0D@dsl-only.net> <20170125083346.GU13006@home.opsec.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170125083346.GU13006@home.opsec.eu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 10.2-RELEASE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.507 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:48:33 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 09:33:46AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi!! > > Mark wrote: > > In the run-up to a release, a number of -BETA and -RC releases may be published for testing purposes. These releases are only supported for a few weeks, as resources permit, and will not be listed as supported on this page. Users are strongly discouraged from running these releases on production systems. > > > > B) 11.0-RELEASE would have made 11.0-RC1 not be supported > > (if 11.0-RC1 was even supported for that long). > > > > C) stable/11 is supported > > > > D) head is "supported" (no complaint anyway). > > HEAD is for testing, it's not supported in the word-smithing kind of way 8-} Well, the main cause for confusion was the wording and I didn't know what exactly it triggers, plus it first happened to me on an arm based system and wasn't sure if that unsupported was related to arm. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.