Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:42:08 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <20120821194208.GC46595@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <5033E39C.3060700@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120821132643.GE37262@felucia.tataz.chchile.org> <20120821134623.GH5044@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033D0C0.4030805@FreeBSD.org> <CAGH67wS3jGTh-=b4X%2Bto9B67=_wpfHVqTNVYK-WZ-yVNz7gepQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120821190500.GA46595@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5033E39C.3060700@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:38:04PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 8/21/2012 12:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > 1/ if it fits the schedule: get rid of pkg_* tools in current to be > > able to have a fully pkgng only 10-RELEASE >=20 > I think it would fit better with historic precedents to make pkg > optional (but default on) in 10, and mandatory in 11. As stated > before, I'm fine with removing pkg_* tools from 10 if there is robust > support for them in the ports tree. >=20 > I know you're excited about this project, but let's not lose sight of > how big a change this is, and how important ports are to the project. >=20 That was what "if it fits the schedule" was about. regards, Bapt --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAz5JAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExhlwCfa9wO7Q26VcEIbVbZX4zKLUOm IvwAnR7vY2wV2gu+UmiE+NYzlWzOX6w7 =bGLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120821194208.GC46595>