Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:02:22 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, thierry@herbelot.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.010312150222.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120946590.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12-Mar-01 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > That's what I thought, but Jordan's email really made me doubt that my > vision of things is correct. Particulary, I don't quite understand this > one: > > Statement #1: Utah-GLX doesn't direct render > > Statement #2: From man nv(4) of XFree-4.0.2- "The driver is fully > accelerated, and provides support..." This means 'in 2D'. > So, considering all the above, I don't quite understand "at least 2X the > frame rate using the same OpenGL app", speaking Jordan's words. > > I'm probably missing something here, and I'm very eager to find my way > out :-) Yes, see above :) > Actually, there's one more question I have about XFree-4. IIUC, core GL > libs, such as libGL.so, libOSMesa.so, etc are included in XFree 4.0.2 core > distribution. So how come that lots of applications still have Mesa-3.2 > in their dependencies? No idea :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010312150222.doconnor>