From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Aug 1 13:02:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43F7105B955 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 13:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6565F72EBB for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 13:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id z19-v6so15965547ioh.4 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9iFYQcW5bmYSYAKQpPKP2DdPY4RdHvnvxYD2jmtwvjQ=; b=iyxCR24fC4dqI/L954Zn7ydCbmXmQPWvyEqGSkU2iA1UvVmSLAgAnhguZdSynfF0Hq WnivKz3YwNTX4+eiGKzB85hR/dKcOh4WTlqoFhZzxJjA6RZfH2bcqlmxPV+vav6tfT9a NDWWepXvfKN80sApvLfnZ+tuy0+Q8zS4k1mSlzv0mNVoxrrwnLXhgWPzEr1xbdEGfTbv 1GtDqVC8yoB80lwOxr9H8Ceg5NMsz7IRF/y426zU7i/I8TBNcdoxj0j00btdPrN+paNM b3RARY5wgPgyJGZ2pIsUjoffNQ7RI5DtZUTBLSjohLtrFvyaewH55uwLl9GARo94Rn78 DpRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9iFYQcW5bmYSYAKQpPKP2DdPY4RdHvnvxYD2jmtwvjQ=; b=LEABEsbcCy5dXpdxSaLgBXeatb18OqJQyeOPXTmqFoiNlf8VrkesOECqQUBDf/ZNVL iNGLspoORg2fJxpEM1hLuXmv+nE5zpX5W9MPkNtcrwHt762GU4uNF3hIJvOiASWx1GOf aN8ZOocZ4RXd8v+LXk6pKfVS5oK3ClOCVOFdIpuaSlAyzYr6HJxSN/qH51JcQhZOY01i mRH19LVAoGpWp9w3ht3M2Qk1Yn+TorfnN6JWNiMrAXdUIR0b/Q40iwoDYRh3+XPdmpNq kRjUzmGgbZ4zZJQteCoAh/idi7H9D6bj6pby0FYuhclGMLEXAmkclr7OjrKWe9n2XPQR bnfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEwZwJLabKpLIxDCyN2NgmHBOlpt5UWWHzGjIC0eoYkHJuRRosy r+FCm6Vbq2vC+jWKjOLsT9OJecPQ3LnpQNuSZSgDkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeua2uji37665Jo3KSqhx78c+24h3sP4o9fScVTtTBwXOSp64OteB/mdos3JzjKyjEX3Pu6HBriOS55QEWwyyQ= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3902:: with SMTP id g2-v6mr3217918ioa.168.1533128577684; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:02:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 14:02:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Status of OpenSSL 1.1.1 To: Eric McCorkle Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , freebsd-security , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:02:59 -0000 On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 12:31 PM Eric McCorkle wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm wondering what's the status of OpenSSL 1.1.1 integration into base? > More specifically, is there a repo or a branch that's started the > integration? I'm aware of the wiki page and the list of port build > issues, but that seems to be based on replacing the base OpenSSL with a > port build (similar to the way one replaces it with LibreSSL). > > I have some work I'd like to do that's gating on sorting out the > kernel/loader crypto situation, and I'd very much like to see OpenSSL > 1.1.1 get merged, so I can start to look into doing that. > There are patches to use bear SSL for the loader. OpenSSL is simply too large to use due to limits the loader operates under. Warner Incidentally, if there's something I can do to help out with integrating > 1.1.1 into base, I'd potentially be interested. > >