From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Apr 29 15:20:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA17541 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 15:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA17469; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 15:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 15:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804292220.PAA17469@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Cory Zito Subject: Re: kern/6439: Artisoft "Noderunner" (NE2000) ethernet card not identified correctly Reply-To: Cory Zito Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/6439; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Cory Zito To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, czito@nyx.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/6439: Artisoft "Noderunner" (NE2000) ethernet card not identified correctly Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 17:17:08 -0500 I appologise for not being clear enough in stating that the included patch/workaround was suitable only for people that have the problem, I understand what this is doing and why it can't be integrated into the code (in fact I would cringe at integrating anything that takes out support) the ne1000 cards are still worth supporting and it was never my intention for this patch to be integtrated into the code tree only that at least those searching active bug reports could find at least temporary solution until the ne driver is fixed. I do not understand however why this bug report was moved to the closed status as it is a problem that should be addressed with the NE drivers and can cause major problems if it is not. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message