From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 16 17:24:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6E16A41C for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:24:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F1443D45 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) Received: from [200.152.82.190] (nbr.matik.com.br [200.152.82.190]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6GHOHJJ077638; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:24:17 -0300 (BRST) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) From: AT Matik To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Chris Dionissopoulos Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:24:06 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <001c01c58a17$5dbe4a40$0100000a@R3B> <200507161740.38234.max@love2party.net> <006901c58a22$b37e30c0$0100000a@R3B> In-Reply-To: <006901c58a22$b37e30c0$0100000a@R3B> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507161424.07966.asstec@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Traffic quota features in IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:24:16 -0000 On Saturday 16 July 2005 13:23, Chris Dionissopoulos wrote: > codind skills are not enough, but right now I cannot see any other > way to add new features in ipfw ... IMO ipfw do not need new feature right now but some housekeeping. I think there are some issues outstanding before adding anything and also ipfw is still very sympathic because it has not so much confusing options. p.s. this is not about your patch it is my general opinion > Hmm, do you have a small example. I 'm really intrested for this, > and I can't think any. > you can write count rules, awk and sum the numbers and inject a deny rule when coming to the limit, I believe still less complicated and more individual then an ipfw integrated option. Hans -- Infomatik Internet Technology http://www.matik.com.br A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br