Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:10 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Seagate Archive HDD
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.20.1503270932460.719@laptop.wojtek.intra>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=8KAS9oAeR1LW0yfbdoMeiti1m%2BNNzSYeZavGDS8NVnw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.20.1503261124380.1417@laptop.wojtek.intra> <CAJ-Vmo=8KAS9oAeR1LW0yfbdoMeiti1m%2BNNzSYeZavGDS8NVnw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hm, what's required to get the stripe size for doing IO or whatever
> the under-the-hood thing is for the Sharding?
>
i found that SATA protocol got enhanced for OS to be able to know what 
sector ranges are for each stripe.

So SMR optimized filesystem would certainly be nice. (but not ZFS please).

If your workload is not very write intensive, you may just ignore it and 
allow hard disk to simulate things.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1503270932460.719>