From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 27 08:34:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1550B555; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [188.252.31.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E66F983; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2R8YIvq017099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from laptop.wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2R8YFwE000729; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t2R8YAi3000726; Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: laptop.wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:10 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@laptop.wojtek.intra To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Seagate Archive HDD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (puchar.net [10.0.1.1]); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:34:18 +0100 (CET) Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:34:21 -0000 > Hm, what's required to get the stripe size for doing IO or whatever > the under-the-hood thing is for the Sharding? > i found that SATA protocol got enhanced for OS to be able to know what sector ranges are for each stripe. So SMR optimized filesystem would certainly be nice. (but not ZFS please). If your workload is not very write intensive, you may just ignore it and allow hard disk to simulate things.