Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 May 1996 21:09:32 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>
To:        jmb@freebsd.org, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org (FreeBSD SCSI hackers)
Subject:   Tape performance measurements 
Message-ID:  <199605221909.VAA01659@yedi.iaf.nl>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi there

( I copied -scsi because I think there might be some interest there)

Below is the essence of Jonathan's message that triggered my
measurements.

> > > 	if you have a tape drive that your use successfully
> > > 	plese send me the dmesg output for the drive
> > > 		any quirks that the drive exhibits
> > > 		any tricks you needed to get the drive working

Environment: Asus TP4XE, P100, 16 Mbyte, 2.1R, used with the
	     -current dump (has the kbytes/sec stats).
	     2Gb 5400 rpm Quantum on NCR810, NCR810 shared 
	     the same SCSI bus with the tapes.
	    

DLT measurements:
-----------------

The dmesg entry:
	(ncr0:6:0): "DEC TZ87     (C) DEC 9B3C" type 1 removable SCSI 2

Uncompressed, 10Gb mode.
bash# ./dump 0ubBf 32 10000000 /dev/rst2 /local
  DUMP: finished in 717 seconds, throughput 1247 KBytes/sec

Compressed, 20Gb mode
bash#sh# ./dump 0ubBf 32 10000000 /dev/rst2 /local
  DUMP: finished in 630 seconds, throughput 1418 KBytes/sec

Slightly hacked dump, allows blocking 64

bash# ./dump 0ubBf 64 10000000 /dev/rst2 /local
  DUMP: finished in 657 seconds, throughput 1360 KBytes/sec

Comments: I had expected the 64 blocking to be better than the 32. 
	  My experience is that the compression works better and the
	  drive is therefore faster.

	  I cannot keep the tape streaming, start/stop operation hurts
	  a DLT's performance really big. On a Sun Sparc 20 with Solaris 2.5
	  with the (identical) disk and the DLT on _seperate_ SCSI buses
	  I got almost 1.9 Mbyte/sec for an ufsdump of /usr. When tape
	  and disk were on the same bus on the Sun I also had start/stop
	  operation, and went down to something like 1.4 Mbytes/sec.

	  (Somebody wants to donate me a second NCR810 ? 8-)	

Exabyte 8200 measurements:
--------------------------

The dmesg entry:
	(ncr0:5:0): "EXABYTE EXB-8200 2687" type 1 removable SCSI 1

  DUMP: finished in 700 seconds, throughput 227 KBytes/sec

Comments: If I remember correctly the Exabyte is speced for 240kbytes/sec.
So, running at spec I think.

Archive Viper 525 measurements:
-------------------------------

The dmesg entry:
	(ncr0:3:0): "ARCHIVE VIPER 2525 25462 -007" type 1 removable SCSI 1

bash# ./dump 0ubBf 32 10000000 /dev/rst0 /usr
  DUMP: finished in 845 seconds, throughput 188 KBytes/sec

Comments: this is on a 525Mbyte tape. Speced @ 240 kbytes/sec for 120 ips
	  tapespeed. 180 kbytes/sec for 90 ips speed.
          The tape is kept streaming without problems.
	  -007 is no-good firmware. I'll get -011 and retry the test

Wilko
_     __________________________________________________________________________
 |   / o / /  _   Wilko Bulte             email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl
 |/|/ / / /( (_)  Private FreeBSD site  - Arnhem - The Netherlands
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605221909.VAA01659>