Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 17:07:06 -0400 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Porter's Handbook category violations Message-ID: <20000604170706.J1993@argon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20000603215053.B65314@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 09:50:53PM -0700 References: <20000601232048.K32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000603215053.B65314@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 09:50:53PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> These are not in violation. They belongs in net plain and simple. There
Okay, if they belong in net, they can stay in net.
> is no rule about listing security as a second category.
Yes, there is. See the following URL:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/porters-handbook/x2203.html
> In addition, IMHO the rule you are quoting here should be a guideline and
> not hard. I'm not sure everyone agrees fully with the statement you are
> quoting.
Well, perhaps..
--
Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+
G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000604170706.J1993>