Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:14:21 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice requires libc_r? Message-ID: <20040330.231421.424247612.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20040330003717.GA19883@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20040328175306.GA12134@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20040330.093324.846939848.chat95@mac.com> <20040330003717.GA19883@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <20040330003717.GA19883@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:33:24AM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > > In Message-ID: <20040328175306.GA12134@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > Will OpenOffice ever compile without libc_r present on a system? > > > So far, lang/gcc32 and OOo's version mozilla seem to require > > > libc_r. Yes, I know about /etc/libmap.conf and the possibility of > > > mapping libc_r to libpthread, but if you have no libc_r you > > > can't build OOo. > I think the problem starts with lang/gcc32. In gcc/collect2.c > one finds libc_r is hardcoded. I'm not sure if I can just wired. should be fixed. > change those references to libpthread. I'll play around somemore, > but right now it does not look good for OOo and libpthread. Hm, situation seems to be complicated. gcc-3.3 came with FreeBSD 5.2.1 doesn't produce runnable OOo 1.1.1 since signal handler is somewhat odd. yes, really odd. while gcc 3.3 compiles OOo *1.1.0* happly. if your 5-current's gcc is newer than mine, % gcc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 please try systems's compiler instead. thanks, --nakata maho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330.231421.424247612.chat95>