From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 3 16:48:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FFE16A4CE for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:48:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gatekeeper.radio-do.de (gatekeeper.Radio-do.de [193.101.164.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B6243D49 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fn@radio-do.de) Received: by gatekeeper.radio-do.de (Milliard Gargantubrain Mail Daemon, from userid 65534) id ECCEB58E; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:48:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6?2001?600?1032?666??7] (pbook.radio-do.de [IPv6:2001:600:1032:666::7])ESMTP id 1255C4E4; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:48:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20040803125019.O1361@cactus.fi.uba.ar> References: <20040803125019.O1361@cactus.fi.uba.ar> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Frank Nobis Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:48:40 +0200 To: Fernando Gleiser X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on gatekeeper.radio-do.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Controlling external hardware via lpt0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:48:48 -0000 Am 3. Aug 2004 um 18:04 schrieb Fernando Gleiser: > Is there anything I'm missing? Are there a "programming and using the > parallel port in FreeBSD" guide? > You should try the ppi(4) driver. See the EXAMPLE section of the man=20 page for details how to send single bytes to the port. Gru=DF Frank --=20 Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?