From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Sep 24 11:06:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12709 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:06:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from couatl.uchicago.edu (couatl.uchicago.edu [128.135.21.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12684 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 11:06:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfarrell@couatl.uchicago.edu) Received: (from sfarrell@localhost) by couatl.uchicago.edu (8.9.1/8.9.0) id NAA02000; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 13:06:38 -0500 (CDT) To: Marc Slemko Cc: Mike Smith , stephen farrell , emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sybase/linux References: From: stephen farrell Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 24 Sep 1998 13:06:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: Marc Slemko's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:53:35 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: <87k92tmlld.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> Lines: 48 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marc Slemko writes: > On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > PLEASE SEND EMULATION-RELATED QUESTIONS TO freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org > > > > Thankyou. > > > > > ok, with great anticipation i downloaded sybase linux (go to > > > redhat.com--it's avaliable for FREE!)... i then check it out and to my > > > grave dissappointment it uses libc6. > > > > > > what's the prospects on running this beast under freebsd? how about > > > linux-libs with gnu libc? > > > > You need a very-up-to-date Linux LKM, and the add-on library pack at > > ftp://time.cdrom.com/pub/incoming/libs.tar.gz. This should make it > > into the 3.0 ports collection at some stage. > > > > Unfortunately, it appears like the license prohibits you from using it > on FreeBSD under emulation. > > The license when you download from Caldera says: > > LICENSE & LICENSE RESTRICTIONS. You are allowed to install and use the > Software for free as long as you operate the Software at all times only > with the Linux operation system running natively on your hardware > system. You may modify, translate or adapt the Software as long as you > do not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble it (except to the > extent the laws in your jurisdiction specifically prohibit these > restrictions). Redhat doesn't mention any such restriction. That must just be a caldera thing. (i hope). A little bit ironic that a company that is battling microsoft for unfair business practices seems to be anxious to eliminate BSD unix (what other systems emulate linux?? -- there was that sco thing but i don't think that's serious competetion). Oh well. Anyway, do I need 3.0, or can i get the latest linux emulator for 2.2.7? -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message