From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 11:14:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03E416A4CE for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:14:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orb.pobox.com (orb.pobox.com [207.8.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807BA43D70 for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from discussion-lists@linnet.org) Received: from orb (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orb.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8A680A; Tue, 10 May 2005 07:14:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from thinkdog.local.linnet.org (host217-40-157-153.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.40.157.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by orb.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A26991; Tue, 10 May 2005 07:14:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists by thinkdog.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1DVSgx-00025O-I5; Tue, 10 May 2005 12:14:23 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:14:23 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20050510111423.GA7955@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20050509114410.GA2184@uk.tiscali.com> <20050510.005542.95903608.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050510.005542.95903608.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packaging of base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:14:40 -0000 On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 12:55:42AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > As this comes up all the time, I'd say just do it. People here will > talk your ear off. OK. I am just a bit dubious about starting a large chunk of work, only to be told later "we're not going to commit this, the consensus here is we don't want to do it this way because X / Y / Z" Incidentally, do we have a current status on this? http://people.freebsd.org/~kientzle/libarchive/libpkg.3.txt This looks like a pre-requisite for turning the base system into packages. Regards, Brian.