From owner-cvs-all  Wed Dec  9 21:46:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA04008
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 9 Dec 1998 21:46:33 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jkoshy@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA04000;
          Wed, 9 Dec 1998 21:46:29 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkoshy)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 21:46:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Koshy <jkoshy>
Message-Id: <199812100546.VAA04000@hub.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc: committers@hub.freebsd.org, vanmaren@fast.cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: Swat teams (was: problem reports) 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:42:34 +1030."
             <19981210154234.D12688@freebie.lemis.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk



> From what I've seen, the big problem is not the cases where people
> submit patches, but where they submit PRs with no fix and with hardly
> enough information to guess what the problem is (or even if there is a
> problem). 

There are many of those no doubt.  However, a lot of our PR submitters are
quite knowledgeable and do submit patches.  We should give PRs with patches
a higher priority.  Even if the patch is wrong, it is a sign that the PR
submitter did put in some work before filing the PR.

Koshy
<jkoshy@freebsd.org>




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message