Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:27:58 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available
Message-ID:  <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:51 -0400")
References:  <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CADLo83_r3SgYj6apifN6NTCwZ-ApYbLkyMOS5zcCmTFst_Vcow@mail.gmail.com> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes:

> Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes:
>
>> Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> writes:
>>
>>> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no such option in Posix standard, too.
>>>
>>> What is this option about, do we need to add something ?
>>
>> No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem.
>> I'll take another look.
>>
>> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit.
>
>>    Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..
>>    sort: invalid option -- 2
>
> I'll let you know what I find.

This is taking longer than I had hoped; apparently I am handicapped by
the fact that I do not know ruby at all. I am having difficulty finding
a call out to the sort program, as opposed to sort routines implemented
in ruby.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4439998mwx.fsf>