Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:27:58 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CFT: new BSD-licensed sort available Message-ID: <4439998mwx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:08:51 -0400") References: <4F60C059.7060904@FreeBSD.org> <44pqcd8yhd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <CADLo83_r3SgYj6apifN6NTCwZ-ApYbLkyMOS5zcCmTFst_Vcow@mail.gmail.com> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A30107B5E9D2A6@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <44d38d8qad.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <447gyl8nss.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes: > Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes: > >> Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> writes: >> >>> There is no option "-2" in the new BSD sort or in the GNU sort. There is no such option in Posix standard, too. >>> >>> What is this option about, do we need to add something ? >> >> No, clearly I have misdiagnosed the problem. >> I'll take another look. >> >> Sorry for the confusion. > > I think I'll need to dig into portsdb itself a bit. > >> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. >> sort: invalid option -- 2 > > I'll let you know what I find. This is taking longer than I had hoped; apparently I am handicapped by the fact that I do not know ruby at all. I am having difficulty finding a call out to the sort program, as opposed to sort routines implemented in ruby.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4439998mwx.fsf>