From nobody Fri Mar 29 21:51:03 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V5vHF49Jfz5FqkD; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V5vHF3kdgz4PCD; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1711749065; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yHiqWJ9OjLXAV7gCwa5aWPqU+aY9F7DElLT/8s6oXdg=; b=dL7vB2dkiX+qHdQOm3C70UIUuFzCm9cyA/K82ijPkeaumfVp6/g/8NUxfLCDYMxPCkWPut zssimrnnZLsbnlCx/yJLET6lVYSMJl0dREyRLzgfNIQtHoEZKxCEjnlcBNM9Ts/pO/TgMJ 9RfaiADYQyHNJuXIN5oltAf2ieXB1obAaViEhuBh63TjgFmSUPrG8okOaHaBANL4JCsF3F 0vHdYNBOi2I1Ljv8bIZt4cyr/NQM/N8lgSS1cI3cqV9cZoXnRVYPzfBGiI/Fy8dUDmyoFk czWkjlEYcTS+9UX5+sEJYzyd2uqt5CLzmw89oGwz+Rxm/19OL264v91xhlp2rg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1711749065; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tbkNqd6krXp7BikRoS4Rr7sy09pmU9DgwW0XHssVBv4lorZUTLI7xwe7eW1x/aFZRLGvEN 6+gBxQkB6gzHRgusxkYRMBEYhc03vN1H6bZ35nwTtko31IUspoL34gH6vMX6+in7ttCaKN oh+bkVMpOWnjnnfCtIytnKAvmurWDyPirT2WCYUcmegIalOXVd5CsaIPWQr2tLVmRXw69T HM0K/BN8ih4ZM4+dnuTQmhjreINsjM0ihtID5DepQrW1VtZeHrrCkr/5At9lqdBn45MrnM qQNM7nwpQaHxRi6PFpBXwTtS7A8txP6vaX0FH342HU9ljeLnPkD3D2+RJ2C98w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1711749065; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yHiqWJ9OjLXAV7gCwa5aWPqU+aY9F7DElLT/8s6oXdg=; b=RFy1gGTc4RzQ3wBmJWx39IlLeRgam6itYsFJcvQHWwTWFpwHzbZa2qHqo4UkL1gRi/Nlxy Tk46LWW6jWzPsVz8Ph3SE2pl8FjrZGjK+5kVVVhhF4quuiKLRXkuJ+iGTah2OzsZKYOs3B YMYnZiPAzo5X5ES1OgF6VPPOmQq6i4oryQo90PBSwDbIJjmlTLizHQ1j8KhOFOOdW4P3MH tusrlcQUMjFSgNKQGqHu72QvbCmas4aliBVY/0qri4Hui7WJxlt1UyW356LvCR/6h+QkHf kDp0J5PRXOda7/UMK8jDKE74qmiFmiY8LBt3mKlGjO0rm6etMWlrxx8Sig8vhg== Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [176.31.115.77]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4V5vHF2d8FzcT6; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 21:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ED9B2180CFE; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:51:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:51:03 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Yuri Victorovich Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: d22f15315b93 - main - devel/gmake43: Corrections Message-ID: <65w54zunovqsagaf2b45n5ip3y72r646jax6hzu3w35i3imr3f@aoyiarndzbve> References: <202403292007.42TK7lhI072363@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <56f4fdc0-f9fb-4578-ae25-88bfc5aad9f0@freebsd.org> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56f4fdc0-f9fb-4578-ae25-88bfc5aad9f0@freebsd.org> On Fri 29 Mar 14:17, Yuri Victorovich wrote: > On 3/29/24 13:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > As I have been told by other this is not explicit enough, an explicit version of > > this email is: please revert gmake43 addition we are not at a point where it is > > actually required. > > > But should the users of science/nwchem do (at some point I was one of them)? They can use the quarterly branch for now. > > With gmake-4.4.1 it builds for 20+ hours and times out. > > Try 'pkg search nwchem' - it isn't found. > > They aren't going to quickly fix the build. It isn't slightly broken, it is > broken a lot, and has always been. With gmake-4.3 it is also unnecessarily > slow, but passable. > > > Are you suggesting to just revert the change, and make NWChem broken again? Give a chance to upstream to fix (you contacted them only a couple of hours ago) Give a chance to others to analyse and provide a workaround. > > Could you please elaborate how is this going to make thing better? > > Is it worse to have one extra devel/gmakeNN version used to work around this > problem and fix the failure, or to keep science/nwchem broken? Because we don't always need a hammer to kill a fly, when we will have no other solution left then maybe this will be time to evaluate gmake43, but we are not there yet. Best regards, Bapt