Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 15:42:43 -0700 From: "Trevor Larock" <trev@larock.ca> To: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: AES-GCM In kernel Message-ID: <924596cfc6a64d8f881d90bfb14d8beb@dpmail22.doteasy.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
I was interested to know more about AES-GCM plans for the kernel.
I have seen a few posts about patches that might get committed but
there didn't seem to be further discussion. Any related info/roadmap plans?
Thanks,Trev Larock
_______________________________________________________
Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting
http://www.doteasy.com
From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 23:14:21 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322CA47
for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:21 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bounces+73574-4a99-freebsd-hackers=freebsd.org@sendgrid.me)
Received: from o3.shared.sendgrid.net (o3.shared.sendgrid.net [208.117.48.85])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB2A12F99
for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info;
h=from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
s=smtpapi; bh=Fw8Gz41eB7OHabfdbMqiHV3j/xY=; b=jKPGD4tzxTQZOwKBi4
O4OJlro5Qjf/ZRxB1zVkHtQ0aFQvn7vHG12plcyMdJ59tqv0+1b/kTTHTVNPjp7t
zS58SETXMxKA7rc3o5PKKAfisurOjUHnOO8V92q5f/ef3EjyaLwEZu4UbI8CRT6Z
TX91ltW9Lq9EJv6wQzzcemdEAReceived: by mf40.sendgrid.net with SMTP id mf40.4901.5270414B9
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.60.208.15])
by mi16 (SG) with ESMTP id 142067f0ff4.1c70.25bc3
for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 56936 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2013 23:14:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1)
by ec2-107-20-205-189.compute-1.amazonaws.com with ESMTP;
29 Oct 2013 23:14:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 49487 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2013 23:12:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1)
by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 29 Oct 2013 23:12:54 -0000
Message-ID: <527040F6.6080309@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:12:54 -0700
From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Automated submission of kernel panic reports
References: <526F8EB3.1040205@freebsd.org> <l4o56q$ssp$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <l4o56q$ssp$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SG-EID: W2XBZA0V/n0voZZ6SjDkgjXvzGvkLIaljy40FLIRIHTVMXCc7ynl2WKQUz0qqp0cvRDC0oXYcLIwIGdSvjJbUGi44CeHoRqV6/d5vXox7vNXHrMMGGhpDD3ol2iXY9YRw1SFlhchZArbjPmHabozrzj+5W8uYNPZE2erpVwR1xIX-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>,
<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:14:21 -0000
On 10/29/13 04:12, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 29/10/2013 11:32, Colin Percival wrote:
>> If ${panicmail_autosubmit} is set to YES, this information is encrypted
>> and submitted via email. The email which is sent looks like this:
>> http://pastebin.com/AaCuxvDg
>
> I haven't tried it, but there's NetPGP (http://www.netpgp.com/) which can
> be used to generate standard PGP-formatted messages instead of using a
> custom format. What do you think about it?
If you need the full functionality of PGP, it looks great. But for this
particular purpose I'd prefer to have 71 lines rather than 40,000 lines.
The same logic is why freebsd-update and portsnap use 'openssl rsautl'
directly instead of gpg/netpgp/etc.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve
Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?924596cfc6a64d8f881d90bfb14d8beb>