From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jan 13 6: 0:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gidgate.gid.co.uk [193.123.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79B115715 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.7) id NAA20058; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:59:31 GMT (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000113135723.007e3700@gid.co.uk> X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:57:23 +0000 To: Stan Brown From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: IP Tunneling, is it possible? Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable List) In-Reply-To: <200001131159.DAA09342@netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, At 06:59 AM 1/13/00 -0500, Stan Brown wrote: [...] > Is there a way to encapsulate packets on the 2 parts of the 170.85.105 > network, and send them to the other part, where they would be > unencapsulated? I think this is called IP Tunneling and Linux appears > to support it, but I would rather not change the 2 gateway/firewall > machines over to Linux, if I don't have to. pipsecd (in ports/security) works well. -- Bob Bishop +44 118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 118 989 4254 (0800-1800 UK) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message