From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Apr 18 2: 8:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DFC37B424 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 02:08:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA02629; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 04:08:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-59.tnt1.rac.cyberlynk.net(209.224.182.59) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma002627; Wed Apr 18 04:07:37 2001 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20010418040049.02297ee0@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 04:07:09 -0500 To: "David W. Chapman Jr." , From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: subscribe In-Reply-To: <0ad801c0c796$fe460f40$931576d8@inethouston.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:34 PM 4/17/01 -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: >We're not going to let you. Resistance is futile. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ian Perrett" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 6:29 PM >Subject: subscribe > > > > > > subscribe > > And why perchance does this require you to keep the CC to the list? My reason is to point out such behaviour isn't all the friendly and the fact there is no reason to CC the list when helping, or heckling, a lost soul. Not what I would call a good example. Everyone else - pardon my adding to noise level here. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message