Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:13:42 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Parv <parv@pair.com> Subject: Re: Portupgrade still broken? Message-ID: <200904101113.43891.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <ef8c8a880904100603tc78eeb4p35d64041787a46c@mail.gmail.com> References: <b79ecaef0904080551x74c80227h1a4ba5d2adcca905@mail.gmail.com> <20090410125733.GA3645@holstein.holy.cow> <ef8c8a880904100603tc78eeb4p35d64041787a46c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 10 April 2009 06:03:54 am Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, <parv@pair.com> wrote: > > What was the last working version? =A0It would be simpler for this > > Ruby simpleton to generate a patch than to debug through the > > stack trace. > > FWIW, my current workaround for thi problem is to portdowngrade to the > latest portupgrade 2.4.3 > portupgrade-2.4.3_2,2 is working. > > HTH I looked at the timeline using cvsweb.cgi and I think the change to the -R= =20 option in 2.4.3 to "Exclude up-to-date packages" is when it stopped working= =20 for me at times. I thought it was a mismatch between versions of the ruby=20 ports. I would force rebuild -fR portupgrade and it would go away. With the= =20 changes to the port system between 4 and 6 April 2009, I could make it fail= =20 100% trying to -rR libxcb.=20 The machine that had the archive of email I had sent in 2008 died. Now, it= =20 looks like there is something that is being stomped on when you have too ma= ny=20 dependancies. I looked at the version on my system but I don't speak Ruby := ). Kent =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200904101113.43891.kstewart>