From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 14 6:10:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5900737B71C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 06:10:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 14 Mar 2001 14:10:06 +0000 (GMT) To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: Christos Zoulas , tcsh-bugs@mx.gw.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcsh 6.10.00 echo;echo;echo; bug with fix In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:59:08 +0300." <20010314155908.A72442@nagual.pp.ru> X-Request-Do: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:10:06 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200103141410.aa44559@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Since internal 'echo' does nothing, it _not_ used in any old csh scripts, > while 'echo ""' does the same thing in both old and new variants, so old > scripts will works in the same way. Will it change what happens if you do: set null="" echo $null (this produces nothing in "traditional" tcsh and csh)? > Since old csh is not maintained anymore, we don't need to preserve exact > void compatibility with unsupported and not maintained other platforms > software with no practical reason. I guess we should leave it up to the tcsh folks. There are other internal csh commands which behave differently to external commands (nice and time come to mind). I think it is known that 'echo ""' is a relatively portable way of printing a blank line. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message