From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 25 15:17:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E08837 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7394479B for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hz10so1077583pad.7 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KAQP/ULbtgn8RKPFFlwduPUfffHyjL2sm8oEvhj5XWM=; b=KN/Ri4Hs/y1EGzhw7iCgQs/eOSoZ4bRJZ6djpVcGUWu2BZYYvI8JBzpaR/Mf8yqR2+ njA2Rh8EG/lAzIMEf95mUPjeRzlh7hmu1Tpbs9+rMKcb55HSh1FMSjlP4Trpnaew8b9B HFH4IShzEupI3Jc7ArQwRoLaZaVUIceIykPvA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=KAQP/ULbtgn8RKPFFlwduPUfffHyjL2sm8oEvhj5XWM=; b=hkOOUBQqSHTXhedzZ13H/1ZE+wIi4PXXyTFhA+iHBXhUWss/CNN9S7Wo+rtSDE97tZ +N9px4dnsX9J7WYMfHiUoxPQigt1gNJ47DVEbPlFMPKwGZwr7PnEtCQNuHTwlOBwjOzN M2tPMNtgAvOzy20lFgbwvKjTlreFjctmZH8sDlw/p81Am4H76xGmFkIrPjJ528jMzqD4 RAxdtEIV4uxCsVkL+wohI30MIdbvix8NyxRxqeaS/N7NqVThLUkE92hpz3AISonCBQg1 N45LCHlWRY6zZjRjFJfu41hHkvUwHLl0bNbx+GBT31oyPYaZyrVQkPOjZdKLaXMGFYay Nr3A== X-Received: by 10.68.129.9 with SMTP id ns9mr18322856pbb.16.1364224644067; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.139.162 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <515063FD.1090008@FreeBSD.org> References: <515052EB.30409@FreeBSD.org> <51505A60.8070809@FreeBSD.org> <51506111.5030402@FreeBSD.org> <515063FD.1090008@FreeBSD.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:16:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: LEGAL variable to capture generic issues To: Alex Dupre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0s4dBMZgPqzAJlTS+13NKOtfDuFtbI8HUIqmDUM+vqNYed5zSR01YC+97oyVql5ziXkCd Cc: freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:17:30 -0000 On 25 March 2013 10:49, Alex Dupre wrote: > Eitan Adler ha scritto: >> This is insufficient to include, say, line 212: >> >> "raknet-* devel/raknet Original license is >> Indy license, special authorization granted to provide RakNet under >> GPL v3" > > Ehmm, I could argue about the private email permission The email has been made public (see the files directory). > but if it's > listed in LEGAL it should be marked as RESTRICTED or NO_CDROM, otherwise > it should not listed there or NO_PACKAGE. However, merely being listed as NO_PACKAGE is insufficient as some NO_PACKAGE entries are not for legal issues. > (the LICENSE framework already says that > special authorization has been granted). It should also be listed in LEGAL in this case (there was a long discussion about this in the past). -- Eitan Adler