Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Jul 2012 08:07:10 +0000
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?)
Message-ID:  <6A57F340-D9F0-4352-B009-4C211CB931F9@lists.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <0AFE3C4A-22DB-4134-949F-4D05BBFC4C6C@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8CA35.7040209@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7. Jul 2012, at 23:45 , Doug Barton wrote:

> On 07/07/2012 16:34, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On 7. Jul 2012, at 23:17 , Doug Barton wrote:

>>> Other than authoritative DNS, what features does unbound lack that =
you want?
>>=20
>> DNS64 as a start.=20
>=20
> Personally I would classify that as a highly-specialized request, and
> would point you to the bind* ports. I acknowledge that others may have =
a
> different view.

Just to give you an idea - there are US nation-wide networks that depend
on it these days.  It's become an essential feature unfortunately.

/bz

--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                 You have to have visions!
   It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6A57F340-D9F0-4352-B009-4C211CB931F9>