From owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 13 14:22:48 2008
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ADD106568C;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz)
Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692D78FC12;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA019CB167;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz
Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 7Ogu9w1eMLO0; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lev.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B49D9CB53B;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rdivacky@localhost)
	by lev.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m9DEM3so099794;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:03 +0200
From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20081013142203.GA99640@freebsd.org>
References: <200810131300.m9DD0MaR076808@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20081013131047.GA84887@freebsd.org> <86skr0zlav.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org,
	svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org,
	svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs
	fs/procfs
X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree
	<svn-src-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable>, 
	<mailto:svn-src-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable>,
	<mailto:svn-src-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:22:48 -0000

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > > Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > > what about commiting this to note this change?
> > > > +   <para>A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed.  Many Linux
> > > > +      ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.</para>
> > > "A serious problem was fixed"?  Really?  And if none of that software
> > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports?
> > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes,
> > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact.
> 
> Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread
> Roman's proposed relnotes entry.  Do you think it gives a correct
> impression of the nature and severity of the issue?

my intention was to advertise that flash9 works ok now. Which is 
a thing a lot of people care about. Feel free to submit your own
wording.