Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:46:58 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gahr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds. Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=bTQsUuYQT1ThmFUtTfwGVWResBxM8wOgX5aBmQTqvyw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F194587.8070301@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F18C5F9.2050900@FreeBSD.org> <20120120093057.GA5662@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F194587.8070301@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Matthew Seaman
<m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> That's a systematic problem: callying sysctl like that will return a
> non-zero status if you ask it about a non-existent sysctl, but doing
> that is basically the point of the test. One fix would be:
>
> =C2=A0HAS_SSE!=3D =C2=A0${SYSCTL} -i -n hw.instruction_sse 2>/dev/null
Why is this in a port? This should be based on an OPTION.
>
> It's only a warning though, so INDEX generation should still work.
--=20
Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=bTQsUuYQT1ThmFUtTfwGVWResBxM8wOgX5aBmQTqvyw>