Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 23:52:36 +0100 From: Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Mario Lobo <lobo@bsd.com.br> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Firefox memory usage Message-ID: <CAM8r67Atv4NY0=e2=TO0ksuboLs0%2BtiW2LB1n5phR7y2yTmTzA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAM8r67ATXU==emMG=C1dQ1tL2%2BfPuO1eyp_2RV%2BCJpd0uK42VA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2ByoEx9rAmDP0xoqqDsn6_a5_anRmf=6Y6nKWCxDaoza1F_o5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8r67ATXU==emMG=C1dQ1tL2%2BfPuO1eyp_2RV%2BCJpd0uK42VA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
what is more. something has changed in Xorg recently (1..2 year) that makes it less responsive..? especially when the CPU is consumed by stuff like Firefox sometimes i need to click one thing several times. like the input was polled by delays and not using interruptus. maybe evdev? i have i5 5gen cpu 8gb ram intel graphics. even when i used bare vesa framebuffer around 2010 it was not that bad. did anyone observe such issues? -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info On Sun, Nov 8, 2020, 23:46 Tomasz CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote: > yuupp i even close it quite often and clean up tabs but my Atari was > faster :-( > > welcome to the brave new world where first better website is probably more > complex (in terms of frameworks and dependencies and memory footprint) than > the OS itself ;-) > > also ~80+ Firefox introduced some nasty ideas such as "profile downgrade > protection" so i can only imagine what kind of team took over the project > :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAM8r67Atv4NY0=e2=TO0ksuboLs0%2BtiW2LB1n5phR7y2yTmTzA>