Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:38:07 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/25436: csh "nice" command does not behave in sync with usr.bin/nice Message-ID: <20010228153807.A392@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200102280420.f1S4K3T13698@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:20:03PM -0800 References: <200102280420.f1S4K3T13698@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:20:03PM -0800, Dima Dorfman wrote: > The following reply was made to PR bin/25436; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> > To: rwatson@freebsd.org > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: bin/25436: csh "nice" command does not behave in sync with usr.bin/nice > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:10:44 -0800 > > > > > >Number: 25436 > > >Category: bin > > >Synopsis: csh builtin nice behaves improperly > > > > However, what does worry me is that the csh nice command doesn't appear to > > work properly, and report errors correctly. > > It works, it just doesn't report errors; it throws away the return > value from setpriority(2). I can send patches for this, but that > would mean taking off three or four files off the vendor branch. Is > tcsh actively maintained? If so, where should patches be submitted > to? Anyone? I believe Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com> is the tcsh maintainer; at least, his name has come up more than once on the fbsd mailing lists, and his name and e-mail are at the bottom of src/contrib/tcsh/README. Also in the README is "The tcsh mailing list: tcsh@mx.gw.com". G'luck, Peter -- If I were you, who would be reading this sentence? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010228153807.A392>