From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 31 0:32:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from heechee.tobez.org (254.adsl0.ryv.worldonline.dk [213.237.10.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7544337B403 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:32:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B93B6541D; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:32:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:32:20 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: John Merryweather Cooper Cc: FreeBSD-PORTS Subject: Re: How to tell when BUILD vs. RUN_DEPENDS is appropriate/more appropriate Message-ID: <20010731093220.A16762@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , John Merryweather Cooper , FreeBSD-PORTS References: <20010730201214.O82760@johncoop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010730201214.O82760@johncoop>; from jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net on Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:12:14PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 08:12:14PM -0700, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > Now, LIB_DEPENDS is (usually) pretty easy--if a port needs a library > that's not already on the system, one is really going to know it when > the linker fails. But differentiating between a BUILD_DEPENDS and a > RUN_DEPENDS seems to be a much grayer area. How to resolve this such > that not only does a port build correctly, but bento doesn't also > complain about what appears to be the entire tree for python or perl > not being in the pkg-plist. I am not sure I follow you here. Perl is in the base system, is not it? \Anton. -- May the tuna salad be with you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message