From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 31 04:50:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC94637B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 04:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from segfault.kiev.ua (segfault.kiev.ua [193.193.193.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3E243F85
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 04:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by segfault.kiev.ua (8) with UUCP id h5VBoE2j077954;
	Sat, 31 May 2003 14:50:14 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua)
Received: (from netch@localhost)
	by iv.nn.kiev.ua (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id h4VBo0Rp009348;
	Sat, 31 May 2003 14:50:00 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from netch)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 14:50:00 +0300
From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Message-ID: <20030531114959.GA324@iv.nn.kiev.ua>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305221020170.82473-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
	<20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org> <xzpr86ib50f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<200305301727.06623.wes@softweyr.com> <xzpr86g2b9y.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
	<20030531073141.GA5288@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <xzpwug7lbhx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpwug7lbhx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
X-42: On
Organization: Dark side of coredump
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject: Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 11:50:31 -0000

 Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:19:06, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about "Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8": 

>> Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
>> as "unsupported".
DES> I didn't use the word "unsupported", I said "deprecated".

Yes. But your message was reply to Wes Peters' one with the following:
wp> Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were
wp> still supported.

Your citation says they are supported, in spite of any deprecation.


-netch-