From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 11:54:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF44B16A419; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A1513C500; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A13148496; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:54:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080124115046.O18050@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <20080116085630.GA32361@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080117080359.U51764@fledge.watson.org> <20080118073445.GA30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118095652.GC30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118103952.D18977@fledge.watson.org> <20080118210621.GF7898@cs.cmu.edu> <20080118211556.T46437@fledge.watson.org> <20080119005938.Q53920@fledge.watson.org> <20080121203838.G4194@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Coda on FreeBSD problem reports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:54 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Ivan Voras wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > >> I was looking at the NetBSD Coda parts over the weekend, but it seemed that >> most of the bugs in the FreeBSD code were due to gradual rot as VFS evolved >> and our Coda module source didn't remain code up. > > I see a lot of CODA patches merged to RELENG_7_0 - can you write up a short > overview of what is it's current state in FreeBSD - what works and what > doesn't? Previously Coda in 7.0 would likely panic on trivial use. Now it seems to frequently work on non-trivial use. I do not consider the FreeBSD Coda kernel module productionable in its current state in that it was largely useless on 7.0 prior to three or four days ago, which means that it's only had 2-3 days of testing in its more usable state. :-) I'd like to think that a reasonable goal for 7.1 would be to have Coda no less production-worthy than it is on Linux, the primary development platform for Coda, and to make significant progress on resolving the AFS situation (which will be something to write home about). Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge